[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080323041311.GA4663@suse.de>
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 21:13:11 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, jesper.juhl@...il.com,
chrisw@...s-sol.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...nel.org, jmforbes@...uxtx.org, zwane@....linux.org.uk,
tytso@....edu, rdunlap@...otime.net, davej@...hat.com,
chuckw@...ntumlinux.com, reviews@...cw.f00f.org,
mkrufky@...uxtv.org, cebbert@...hat.com, cavokz@...il.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [patch 07/76] NIU: Bump driver version and release date.
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 12:57:29AM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Furthermore, I honestly don't see how your patch meets the (rather
> strict) requirements of stable series either. So it would be nice if
> one of the stable maintainers stepped up to say that these kind of
> patches are okay to set a precedent for others as well.
These kind of patches are perfectly fine. We trust the maintainers of
drivers and subsystems to tell the -stable maintainers what they want
added to the tree, and if that includes a version number update to make
their lives easier, who are we to say no to that.
Becides, it's not the first time patches like this have been accepted.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists