lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080326120713.24cb8093@harpe.intellique.com>
Date:	Wed, 26 Mar 2008 12:07:13 +0100
From:	Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@...ellique.com>
To:	"Bart Van Assche" <bart.vanassche@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6

Le Wed, 26 Mar 2008 09:42:19 +0100
"Bart Van Assche" <bart.vanassche@...il.com> écrivait:

> Keep in mind that the above test tests two subsystems at the same
> time: RAID-1 + the filesystem on top of it.

I'm using XFS usually, and I've also checked against the raw devices
and it looks the same (2.4 still faster). I must add that the difference
is somewhat reduced when using a single disk drive vs. RAID-1,
obviously due to different buffering policy in the RAID subsystem.

-- 
----------------------------------------
Emmanuel Florac     |   Intellique
----------------------------------------

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ