[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080326120713.24cb8093@harpe.intellique.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 12:07:13 +0100
From: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@...ellique.com>
To: "Bart Van Assche" <bart.vanassche@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6
Le Wed, 26 Mar 2008 09:42:19 +0100
"Bart Van Assche" <bart.vanassche@...il.com> écrivait:
> Keep in mind that the above test tests two subsystems at the same
> time: RAID-1 + the filesystem on top of it.
I'm using XFS usually, and I've also checked against the raw devices
and it looks the same (2.4 still faster). I must add that the difference
is somewhat reduced when using a single disk drive vs. RAID-1,
obviously due to different buffering policy in the RAID subsystem.
--
----------------------------------------
Emmanuel Florac | Intellique
----------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists