linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 109/148] include/asm-x86/serial.h: checkpatch cleanups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 26 Mar 2008 12:28:45 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:	J??rn Engel <joern@...fs.org>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	jirislaby@...il.com, viro@...IV.linux.org.uk, joe@...ches.com,
	tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 109/148] include/asm-x86/serial.h: checkpatch cleanups
	- formatting only

* Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 02:12:58PM +0100, J??rn Engel wrote:
> > CodingStyle has gone too far is this:
> > 	for (i=0; i<10; i++)
> 
> it's a very good argument why we need a consistant style.  The above is
> unreadable crap that hurts my eyes.

same for me.

and PLEASE, folks, even if you _dont_ find that line unreadable, and 
even if you have full power and control over your own subsystem that you 
maintain and can NAK cleanup patches at whim, still _PLEASE_ follow the 
Linux coding style because it inconsistency hurts the eyes of a 
substantial proportion of kernel developers. Other folks might have to 
fix bugs in your code, other folks might want to reuse your code or you 
might go into a different subsystem and give maintainership to someone 
else, etc. etc. Consistent coding style is one of the few concepts that 
only has advantages and no disadvantages at all.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/