linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 5/8] x86_64: Add UV specific header for MMR definitions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080326000820.GA18701@infradead.org>
Date:	Tue, 25 Mar 2008 20:08:20 -0400
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>, mingo@...e.hu,
	tglx@...utronix.de, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 5/8] x86_64: Add UV specific header for MMR definitions

On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 11:04:22AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> bitfields are only problematic on portable code, which this isn't.

it's still crappy to read and a bad example for others.  And last time
I heard about UV it also included an ia64 version, but that's been
loooong ago.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/