linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 6/8] x86_64: Define the macros and tables for the basic UV infrastructure.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080326030338.GB11714@sgi.com>
Date:	Tue, 25 Mar 2008 22:03:38 -0500
From:	Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, mingo@...e.hu,
	tglx@...utronix.de, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 6/8] x86_64: Define the macros and tables for the basic UV infrastructure.

On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 08:09:30PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 11:11:11AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Not sure what physical mode is.
> > 
> > > +#ifdef __BIOS__
> > > +#define UV_ADDR(x)		((unsigned long *)(x))
> > > +#else
> > > +#define UV_ADDR(x)		((unsigned long *)__va(x))
> > > +#endif
> > 
> > But it it would be cleaner if your BIOS just supplied a suitable __va()
> > and then you remove these macros.
> 
> the bios should just have headers of it's own instead of placing this
> burden on kernel code.

See mail from earlier today. The UV_ADDR macro has been eliminated.


--- jack
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/