[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47ECE318.1030809@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:22:48 +0100
From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
CC: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>,
Linux and Kernel Video <video4linux-list@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: v4l & compat_ioctl
On 03/28/2008 12:38 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> BTW i haven't audited them, but if there is u64 or similar in there anywhere
> be careful about alignment.
Well, not good, some ioctls have different numbers on 32 and 64 bit:
struct v4l2_ext_controls {
__u32 ctrl_class;
__u32 count;
__u32 error_idx;
__u32 reserved[2];
struct v4l2_ext_control *controls;
};
#define VIDIOC_G_EXT_CTRLS _IOWR ('V', 71, struct v4l2_ext_controls)
as an example.
And alignment is a problem here (v4l2_std_id is u64):
struct v4l2_standard {
__u32 index;
v4l2_std_id id;
__u8 name[24];
struct v4l2_fract frameperiod; /* Frames, not fields */
__u32 framelines;
__u32 reserved[4];
};
which results in different ioctl numbers too.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists