[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080328113803.GQ29105@one.firstfloor.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 12:38:03 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>,
Linux and Kernel Video <video4linux-list@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: v4l & compat_ioctl
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 12:31:33PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 03/28/2008 12:25 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> >However the new standard way to do this is to not
> >add new stuff into compat_ioctl.c, but define ->compat_ioctl
> >entry points in the low level drivers (and ideally converted
> >them to ->unlocked_ioctl too while you're at it)
>
> Andi, the problem here is, that v4l has only open in fops which in turn
> changes fops to the driver's one, so this would mean change all the drivers
> in v4l...
And? Are there that many? It's a simple mechanical operation.
> I second the converting to unlocked_ioctl and compat_ioctl in longer term
> (for new drivers as a merging rule), but wouldn't be feasible to add them
> to compat ioctl for now?
The problem with compat_ioctl is that it doesn't handle overlapping ioctl
ranges and that the compat code cannot be made modular (although if they
are compatible that is no big problem)
BTW i haven't audited them, but if there is u64 or similar in there anywhere
be careful about alignment.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists