[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080328140056.GC4404@ucw.cz>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:00:57 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Luciano Rocha <luciano@...otux.com>,
Michael Meyer <mike65134@...oo.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: performance differences: "maxcpus=1" vs. "echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online"
On Tue 2008-03-25 18:16:47, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Luciano Rocha <luciano@...otux.com> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 02:47:50PM +0100, Michael Meyer wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > what is the difference between booting a dual core
> > > machine with "maxcpus=1" or by deactivating the second
> > > core at run time with "echo 0 >
> > > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online"?
> >
> > maxcpus=1 should turn off the SMP alternative and switch to UP only,
> > optimising some locks and instructions.
>
> CPU hot unplug will do the same. But it is unlikely it accounts
> for that much performance difference.
>
> If he used maxcpus=0 it would make sense. maxcpus=0 disables
> the IO-APIC which likely makes a large difference. But it should
> be actually slower.
>
> There should be actually no difference in theory between max_cpus=1
> and hot unplug to one CPU. Might be some bug.
Or thermal effect. I'd expect that behaviour with bad cooling.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists