lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 21:45:33 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> To: Jack Steiner <steiner@....com> Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] x86_64: Support for new UV apic * Jack Steiner <steiner@....com> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 09:15:32PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Jack Steiner <steiner@....com> wrote: > > > > > Index: linux/arch/x86/kernel/apic_64.c > > > =================================================================== > > > --- linux.orig/arch/x86/kernel/apic_64.c 2008-03-28 13:00:22.000000000 -0500 > > > +++ linux/arch/x86/kernel/apic_64.c 2008-03-28 13:06:12.000000000 -0500 > > > @@ -738,6 +738,7 @@ void __cpuinit setup_local_APIC(void) > > > unsigned int value; > > > int i, j; > > > > > > + preempt_disable(); > > > value = apic_read(APIC_LVR); > > > > > > BUILD_BUG_ON((SPURIOUS_APIC_VECTOR & 0x0f) != 0x0f); > > > @@ -831,6 +832,7 @@ void __cpuinit setup_local_APIC(void) > > > else > > > value = APIC_DM_NMI | APIC_LVT_MASKED; > > > apic_write(APIC_LVT1, value); > > > + preempt_enable(); > > > } > > > > hm, this looks a bit weird - why are all the preempt-disable/enable > > calls needed? > > The first patch had a preempt disable/enable in the function that > reads apicid (see read_apic_id() in arch/x86/kernel/genapic_64.c). > This seemed necessary since large system generate an apicid by reading > the live id & concatenating it with extra bits. > > One of the review comments suggested that I change the preempt to a > WARN() since reading apic_id really should be done with preemtion > disabled. The added code eliminates the warnings. could you post the stacktraces of the warnings as they occured? All those codepaths should be running with preemption disabled in some natural way. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists