| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20080331140243.GA6212@ucw.cz> Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 16:02:44 +0200 From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> To: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@...il.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: MCE going wild, 14 megs of this in the logs On Sun 2008-03-30 16:57:53, Gene Heskett wrote: > Greetings; > Mar 30 16:46:42 coyote kernel: [469249.031832] MCE: The hardware reports a non > fatal, correctable incident occurred on CPU 0. > Mar 30 16:46:42 coyote kernel: [469249.031838] Bank 1: d400400000000152 > Mar 30 16:46:42 coyote kernel: [469249.031841] MCE: The hardware reports a non > fatal, correctable incident occurred on CPU 0. > Mar 30 16:46:42 coyote kernel: [469249.031844] Bank 2: d40040000000017a > > Its always the same 2 addresses reported, and every 15 seconds. So I have the > non-fatal part of MCE now turned off, & 2.6.24.4 rebuilding. > > I saw this once before, and a nearly round the clock run of memtest86 gave my > memory a clean bill. Processor is an XP-2800, biostar mainboard with NForce2 > chipset. Is this possibly a known artifact of this hardware? Thats expected. If ECC can correct the problem, memtest will pass. I had similar problems, and was told by AMD that I had cpu with bad L2 cache. -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists