[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47F0EE63.3060401@nokia.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 17:00:03 +0300
From: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@...ia.com>
To: Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org>
CC: Adrian Hunter <ext-adrian.hunter@...ia.com>,
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, joern@...ybastard.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file system
Jörn Engel wrote:
>> 3. logfs does not seem to have bad-block handling.
>
> Bad blocks at mkfs time are handled, blocks turning bad later on aren't
> yet.
I personally refuse to compare a finished FS with handles all the
crucial flash features to a non-finished FS. It just makes no sense.
LogFS was talked about back 2005 in Linux Kongress [1], but is not
finished yet. Let's talk about it when it is production ready.
[1]. http://www.linux-kongress.org/2005/abstracts.html#4_4_2
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists