[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <878wzx25s7.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
Date: 01 Apr 2008 13:06:32 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@...dex.ru>
Cc: Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@...g.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, penberg@...helsinki.fi,
Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org>,
ext-adrian.hunter@...ia.com, jwboyer@...il.com
Subject: Re: UBIFS vs Logfs (was [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file system)
Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@...dex.ru> writes:
> Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
> > For me, the motivators to wait for LogFS are mainly the facts that it
> > can work on traditional block devices, and not only on pure flash:
>
> Sorry Thomasz, for me this makes zero sense. There are _much_ better file
> systems for block devices.
I think he refers to flash disks appearing as block devices, like
usb sticks or similar.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists