lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2008 14:23:51 +0300 From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@...dex.ru> To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> CC: Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@...g.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, penberg@...helsinki.fi, Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org>, ext-adrian.hunter@...ia.com, jwboyer@...il.com Subject: Re: UBIFS vs Logfs (was [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file system) Andi Kleen wrote: > Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@...dex.ru> writes: > >> Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: >>> For me, the motivators to wait for LogFS are mainly the facts that it >>> can work on traditional block devices, and not only on pure flash: >> Sorry Thomasz, for me this makes zero sense. There are _much_ better file >> systems for block devices. > > I think he refers to flash disks appearing as block devices, like > usb sticks or similar. Right, I also meant that in my opinion it makes more sense to use traditional file-systems like ext3 on USB-key/MMC and the like stuff (which I confusingly referred as "block devices"), or may be something more "heavy-weight" like XFS or JFS (never tried them, though). -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists