[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0804021353380.31276@sbz-30.cs.Helsinki.FI>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 13:54:26 +0300 (EEST)
From: Pekka J Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
cc: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Subject: Re: kmemcheck caught read from freed memory (cfq_free_io_context)
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Correct, that is always how i understood SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU to work.
>
> Does SLAB (as opposed to SLUB) do it differently?
No, SLAB works this way as well.
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists