[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080402105539.GA5610@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 03:55:39 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Pekka J Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kmemcheck caught read from freed memory (cfq_free_io_context)
On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 09:28:46AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 02 2008, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2 Apr 2008, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > > Good catch, I wonder why it didn't complain in my testing. I've added a
> > > > patch to fix that, please see it here:
> > >
> > > You probably don't have kmemcheck in your kernel ;-)
> >
> > Ehm no, you are right :)
>
> ... and you can get kmemcheck by testing on x86.git/latest:
>
> http://people.redhat.com/mingo/x86.git/README
>
> ;-)
I will check this when I get back to some bandwidth -- but in the meantime,
does kmemcheck special-case SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU? It is legal to access
newly-freed items in that case, as long as you did rcu_read_lock()
before gaining a reference to them and don't hold the reference past
the matching rcu_read_unlock().
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists