[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47F3B6B6.9010802@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 09:39:18 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
CC: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>, andi@...stfloor.org,
mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86_64 boot -v2: Add linked list of struct setup_data
Paul Jackson wrote:
> Huang wrote:
>> On Sat, 2008-03-29 at 23:31 -0500, Paul Jackson wrote:
>>> Huang wrote:
>>>> +/* setup data types */
>>>> +#define SETUP_NONE 0
>>> This define seems unused?
>> I think this can prevent somebody to use 0 as type id.
>
> Why is it a good idea to prevent a 0 type id?
>
It is usually handy to have an ID to use as ignore, or not present, and
for that to be zero.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists