[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080402023947.d4d43f7d.pj@sgi.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 02:39:47 -0500
From: Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
To: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc: hpa@...or.com, andi@...stfloor.org, mingo@...hat.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86_64 boot -v2: Add linked list of struct
setup_data
Huang wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-03-29 at 23:31 -0500, Paul Jackson wrote:
> > Huang wrote:
> > > +/* setup data types */
> > > +#define SETUP_NONE 0
> >
> > This define seems unused?
>
> I think this can prevent somebody to use 0 as type id.
Why is it a good idea to prevent a 0 type id?
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@....com> 1.940.382.4214
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists