linux-kernel - Re: Proposed patch for IDE missing commands

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 03 Apr 2008 17:25:11 +0200
From:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To:	Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>
CC:	x.guimard@...e.fr, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	bzolnier@...il.com, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, petkovbb@...il.com
Subject: Re: Proposed patch for IDE missing commands

Frans Pop wrote:
> Boris Petkov wrote:
>> Please, rebase/redo your patch against latest -rc kernel (in this case
>> 2.6.25-rc8) und run it through scripts/checkpatch.pl in order to adjust it
>> to the kernel coding style. See Documentation/CodingStyle for details.

Why don't linux kernel insiders help first-time contributors here a bit
and simply repost the patch with style fix-up?  That would be a matter
of 10 minutes or so and a more valuable contribution than a mere
RTFCodingStyle.

> Suggest you also read Documentation/SubmittingPatches for the correct way to 
> sign off a patch and such.

Yes, the sign-off is in general required already from the original author.
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--- -=-- ---==
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/