[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9ea470500804030842ne89877dg840c960eb44f0219@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:42:32 +0200
From: "Boris Petkov" <petkovbb@...glemail.com>
To: "Stefan Richter" <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
Cc: "Frans Pop" <elendil@...net.nl>, x.guimard@...e.fr,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bzolnier@...il.com,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Proposed patch for IDE missing commands
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Stefan Richter
<stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de> wrote:
> Frans Pop wrote:
> > Boris Petkov wrote:
> >> Please, rebase/redo your patch against latest -rc kernel (in this case
> >> 2.6.25-rc8) und run it through scripts/checkpatch.pl in order to adjust it
> >> to the kernel coding style. See Documentation/CodingStyle for details.
>
> Why don't linux kernel insiders help first-time contributors here a bit
> and simply repost the patch with style fix-up? That would be a matter
> of 10 minutes or so and a more valuable contribution than a mere
> RTFCodingStyle.
Well, it'll probably take the same time to run checkpatch.pl on it and
simply do what the
tool suggests wrt to style - after all this can't be more complex than
writing kernel code
in itself, now can it? What is more, my suggestion was also to _redo_
the patch against a more
recent kernel version since ide-disk has changed since then and, even
disregarding code
style issues, the patch is inapplicable as such (e.g. deleted
functions) Finally, despite all
that who's-doing-what soul searching, redoing patches has a great
didactical value which
all of us have experienced time and again :).
--
Regards/Gruß,
Boris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists