| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <dd18b0c30804042344we0e62a0s8cd2c7e8137a9e8@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 06:44:02 +0000
From: "Justin Mattock" <justinmattock@...il.com>
To: "Soeren Sonnenburg" <kernel@....de>
Cc: rpurdie@...ys.net, "Julien BLACHE" <jb@...ache.org>,
"Linux Kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: 2.6.25 intended change: smc:kbd_backlight vs. smc::kbd_backlight ?
Hello; there must be some kind of reason for the change from ":" to
"::" smc::kbd_backlight, maybee something with the kernel spitting
out:
[ 464.524630] applesmc: wait status failed: 5 != 4
[ 464.727477] applesmc: wait status failed: c != 8
[ 606.219666] applesmc: wait status failed: 5 != 4
[ 606.421338] applesmc: wait status failed: c != 8
[ 656.152925] applesmc: wait status failed: 5 != 4
[ 656.358032] applesmc: wait status failed: c != 8
[ 743.488092] applesmc: wait status failed: 5 != 4
[ 743.687861] applesmc: wait status failed: c != 8
[ 1559.745211] applesmc: wait status failed: 5 != 4
[ 1559.946876] applesmc: wait status failed: c != 8
[ 1617.527543] applesmc: wait status failed: 5 != 4
[ 1617.733097] applesmc: wait status failed: c != 8
[ 1855.794475] applesmc: wait status failed: 5 != 4
[ 1855.997410] applesmc: wait status failed: c != 8
[ 2062.038870] applesmc: wait status failed: 5 != 4
[ 2062.240451] applesmc: wait status failed: c != 8
[ 2145.673882] applesmc: wait status failed: 5 != 4
[ 2145.874891] applesmc: wait status failed: c != 8
[ 2226.070113] applesmc: wait status failed: 5 != 4
[ 2226.275480] applesmc: wait status failed: c != 8
[ 2233.295702] applesmc: wait status failed: 5 != 4
[ 2233.501599] applesmc: wait status failed: c != 8
[ 2490.349096] applesmc: wait status failed: 5 != 4
[ 2490.554648] applesmc: wait status failed: c != 8
[ 2526.524932] applesmc: wait status failed: 5 != 4
[ 2526.727963] applesmc: wait status failed: c != 8
[ 2994.653714] applesmc: wait status failed: 5 != 4
[ 2994.856479] applesmc: wait status failed: c != 8
[ 3556.760811] applesmc: wait status failed: 5 != 4
[ 3556.960414] applesmc: wait status failed: c != 8
[ 4104.040447] applesmc: wait status failed: 5 != 4
[ 4104.241539] applesmc: wait status failed: c != 8
[ 4183.083313] applesmc: wait status failed: 5 != 4
[ 4183.283102] applesmc: wait status failed: c != 8
[ 4405.815336] applesmc: wait status failed: 5 != 4
[ 4406.013374] applesmc: wait status failed: c != 8
[ 4828.790663] applesmc: wait status failed: 5 != 4
[ 4828.990296] applesmc: wait status failed: c != 8
[ 5001.422026] applesmc: wait status failed: 5 != 4
[ 5001.624074] applesmc: wait status failed: c != 8
[ 5054.881643] applesmc: wait status failed: 5 != 4
[ 5055.085512] applesmc: wait status failed: c != 8
[ 5091.950244] applesmc: wait status failed: 5 != 4
[ 5092.153377] applesmc: wait status failed: c != 8
[ 5142.416144] applesmc: wait status failed: 5 != 4
[ 5142.619838] applesmc: wait status failed: c != 8
[ 5201.180057] applesmc: wait status failed: 5 != 4
[ 5201.378893] applesmc: wait status failed: c != 8
[ 6071.409386] applesmc: wait status failed: 5 != 4
[ 6071.611533] applesmc: wait status failed: c != 8
[ 6563.512077] applesmc: wait status failed: 5 != 4
[ 6563.711152] applesmc: wait status failed: c != 8
[ 6775.019376] applesmc: wait status failed: 5 != 4
[ 6775.218753] applesmc: wait status failed: c != 8
[ 7028.430958] applesmc: wait status failed: 5 != 4
[ 7028.631925] applesmc: wait status failed: c != 8
[ 7069.534835] applesmc: wait status failed: 5 != 4
[ 7069.734629] applesmc: wait status failed: c != 8
[ 7222.764415] applesmc: wait status failed: 5 != 4
[ 7222.964181] applesmc: wait status failed: c != 8
[ 7229.991367] applesmc: wait status failed: 5 != 4
[ 7230.194062] applesmc: wait status failed: c != 8
[ 7250.619742] applesmc: wait status failed: 5 != 5
[ 7250.819656] applesmc: wait status failed: c != 8
[ 7890.440161] applesmc: wait status failed: 5 != 4
[ 7890.641210] applesmc: wait status failed: c != 8
[ 8048.801254] applesmc: wait status failed: 5 != 4
[ 8049.001035] applesmc: wait status failed: c != 8
[ 8170.854568] applesmc: wait status failed: 5 != 4
[ 8171.059915] applesmc: wait status failed: c != 8
[ 8747.146058] applesmc: wait status failed: 5 != 4
[ 8747.345261] applesmc: wait status failed: c != 8
[ 9034.362620] applesmc: wait status failed: 5 != 4
[ 9034.568220] applesmc: wait status failed: c != 8
I'm tired of seeing this, how to get rid of this regression if you
want to call this that.?
regards;
Justin P. Mattock
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 5:32 AM, Soeren Sonnenburg <kernel@....de> wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 15:12 +0000, Justin Mattock wrote:
> > Hello; I noticed this as well, you loose the greatest feature; the
> > cool leds lights on the keyboard with the macbook pro,
> > A solution that worked for me was to compile pommed from the source
> > and edit kbd_backlight.h
> > regards;
> > Justin P. Mattock
>
> Yeah, but it will not only affect pommed... and I don't see the
> rationale of introducing :: to separate things... so I think we should
> have another patch replacing the :: with ':' again to unbreak userspace
> for 2.6.25.
>
> Could someone more official please respond to this regression (CCing
> Rafael to record it)
>
> Soeren
>
> > On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 6:54 AM, Soeren Sonnenburg <kernel@....de> wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 20:58 +0200, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> > > > Dear all,
> > > >
> > > > I am wondering whether the change from
> > > >
> > > > /sys/devices/platform/applesmc.768/leds/smc:kbd_backlight (2.6.24)
> > > > /sys/devices/platform/applesmc.768/leds/smc::kbd_backlight (2.6.25)
> > > >
> > > > is intentional?
> > > >
> > > > I recognized that it breaks current userspace applications changing the
> > > > keyboard background leds like pommed...
> > >
> > > OK it looks like commit 6c152beefbf90579d21afc4f7e075b1f801f9a75 from
> > > Richard Purdie, 'leds: Standardise LED naming scheme' introduced this
> > > change.
> > >
> > > Why do we need '::' instead of a single ':' (that would not have broken
> > > things)?
> > >
> > > Also sometimes only a single ':' seperator is used like in
> > > corgi:green:mail but e.g. not in clevo::mail ?!
> > >
> > > Soeren
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
--
Justin P. Mattock
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists