[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <36ca99e90804070657t4435f1a2ldd78ad5bf5978550@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 15:57:29 +0200
From: "Bert Wesarg" <bert.wesarg@...glemail.com>
To: "Mike Travis" <travis@....com>
Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86: modify show_shared_cpu_map in intel_cacheinfo v2
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 3:24 AM, Mike Travis <travis@....com> wrote:
> --- linux-2.6.x86.orig/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c
> +++ linux-2.6.x86/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c
> @@ -593,14 +593,17 @@ static ssize_t show_size(struct _cpuid4_
>
> static ssize_t show_shared_cpu_map(struct _cpuid4_info *this_leaf, char *buf)
> {
> + unsigned long end = ALIGN((unsigned long)buf, PAGE_SIZE);
May I suggest this:
ptrdiff_t len = PTR_ALIGN(buf + PAGE_SIZE - 1, PAGE_SIZE) - buf;
> + if (len == 0)
> + len = PAGE_SIZE;
Than this is not necessary.
> +
> + if (len >= 2) {
> + n = cpus_scnprintf(buf, len-2, this_leaf->shared_cpu_map);
> + buf[n++] = '\n';
> + buf[n] = '\0';
> }
> return n;
> }
Apart from my suggestion and the use of cpus_scnprintf I think this patch is ok.
Bert
PS: sorry for the long delay.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists