[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080407160155.5e6d77f0.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 16:01:55 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, haavard.skinnemoen@...el.com,
rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk, lethal@...ux-sh.org,
philipp.zabel@...il.com, pavel@....cz, tony@...mide.com,
paul@...an.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] Clocklib: use correct name for 3,6MHz clock
On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:24:11 +0400
Dmitry Baryshkov <dbaryshkov@...il.com> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/common/sa1111.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/common/sa1111.c b/arch/arm/common/sa1111.c
> index eb06d0b..282a4d9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/common/sa1111.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/common/sa1111.c
> @@ -627,7 +627,7 @@ __sa1111_probe(struct device *me, struct resource *mem, int irq)
> if (!sachip)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - sachip->clk = clk_get(me, "GPIO27_CLK");
> + sachip->clk = clk_get(me, "3_6MHz_CLK");
> if (!sachip->clk) {
> ret = PTR_ERR(sachip->clk);
> goto err_free;
Again, there's just not enough information for us (well: me) to be able to
evaluate this patch.
For example, if the current name is "incorrect" then why shouldn't we fix
it in 2.6.25? 2.6.24? etc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists