[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <386072610804070115s57dfd49fgad01218e820167b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 01:15:18 -0700
From: "Bryan Wu" <cooloney@...nel.org>
To: "Jeff Garzik" <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc: "Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, magnus.damm@...il.com,
damm@...l.co.jp, lethal@...ux-sh.org, nico@....org,
"Mike Frysinger" <vapier.adi@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Blackfin STAMP537 compiling error in 2.6.25-rc8
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 1:13 AM, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org> wrote:
>
> Bryan Wu wrote:
>
> > We found the latest kernel compile failed with Blackfin STAMP537
> > configuration on our daily build machine.
> > ---
> > CC drivers/net/smc91x.o
> > drivers/net/smc91x.c: In function 'smc_rcv':
> > drivers/net/smc91x.c:513: warning: passing argument 1 of 'insw' makes
> > integer from pointer without a cast
> > drivers/net/smc91x.c: In function 'smc_hardware_send_pkt':
> > drivers/net/smc91x.c:620: warning: passing argument 1 of 'outsw' makes
> > integer from pointer without a cast
> > drivers/net/smc91x.c:1859:32: error: macro "SMC_GET_MAC_ADDR" requires
> > 2 arguments, but only 1 given
> > drivers/net/smc91x.c: In function 'smc_probe':
> > drivers/net/smc91x.c:1859: error: 'SMC_GET_MAC_ADDR' undeclared (first
> > use in this function)
> > drivers/net/smc91x.c:1859: error: (Each undeclared identifier is
> > reported only once
> > drivers/net/smc91x.c:1859: error: for each function it appears in.)
> > make[2]: *** [drivers/net/smc91x.o] Error 1
> > make[1]: *** [drivers/net] Error 2
> > make: *** [drivers] Error 2
> > ---
> >
> > That is because my -mm tree fixing bug patch:
> >
> (http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=9e6db60825ef7e7999abc610ce256ba768e58162)
> > was merged into mainline before the smc91x API change patch in -mm:
> >
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.25-rc5/2.6.25-rc5-mm1/broken-out/smc91x-pass-along-private-data-v2.patch
> >
> > Did I miss something here? or this patch is on the way before 2.6.25
> > final release?
> >
>
> It looks like I missed something... I thought akpm was going to send the
> patch for -mm in?
>
> If not, let's revert this one...
>
ok, no problem, it is ok for me.
Thanks
-Bryan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists