[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080407081643.GC3066@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 10:16:43 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
Cc: Mike Travis <travis@....com>, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] x86: add cpus_scnprintf function v2
* Paul Jackson <pj@....com> wrote:
> I still have some concerns with this cpus_scnprintf patch.
>
> I've taken them up with Mike offline for initial consideration.
>
> If others have questions, concerns or enthusiasms for this patch, Mike
> and I would be interested.
i dont mind the old patch either (which did an ugly temporary
allocation), if it keeps the ABI. I dont think it's a big deal, lets not
allow it to become a roadblock, and the overall goal of all these
patches [4096 CPU support in upstream Linux] is important and i'm
enthusiastic about that ;-)
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists