[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080408173418.GD7656@cvg>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 21:34:18 +0400
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
Subject: Re: bootmem allocator
[Andi Kleen - Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 10:12:06AM +0200]
| On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 10:04:46AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
| >
| > * Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
| >
| > > > hm, bootmem allocator is supposed to clear memory. We have a couple
| > > > of places that rely on that.
| > >
| > > I was actually considering to change that for the GB pages hugetlbfs
| > > patchkit, because memset for 1G is a little slow and not needed (will
| > > be cleared later anyways) and it might be a problem for very large
| > > systems with a lot of such pages at boot.
| >
| > changing the default behavior of bootmem alloc to be non-clearing is a
| > really bad idea that will only cause unrobustness. The proper approach
| > is to add an _opt-in_ API that does not clear memory
|
| I was considering that too, but we have so many weird variants of bootmem
| with opt in and opt out and even combinations of both now that the whole thing
| is starting to look really pear shaped (I admit I added some of them
| in the past myself but I'm not proud). Would be a great project for
| someone to consolidate that all a bit.
|
| -Andi
|
Andi, could you a bit clarify what exactly do you mean?
- Cyrill -
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists