[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080408082354.GA13940@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 10:23:54 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@...lshack.com>
Cc: Mike Travis <travis@....com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, heukelum@...tmail.fm,
Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] boot: increase stack size for kernel boot loader
decompressor
* Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@...lshack.com> wrote:
> I did see that the malloc space that the inflate code is using is
> taken from _after_ the end of the bss. I don't see how this is
> protected from being used/overwritten. Changing the stack size changes
> the memory layout a bit... maybe you were so unlucky to create a
> vmlinux image that was just barely smaller than some threshold and
> increasing the stack size made the decompression/relocation area be
> located somewhere else?
>
> Test patch follows.
that's a really interesting theory.
FWIIW, i've been booting allyesconfig bzImages for a long time (with
only minimal amount of drivers disabled - mostly old ISA ones that
assume the presence of the real hardware), and they boot and work fine
on both 32-bit and 64-bit typical whitebox PCs. That means huge bzImages
that decompresses into a ~41 MB kernel image. I'd expect that to be a
rather severe test of the decompressor.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists