| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.3.96.1080409100423.8706317F-100000@fergus.americas.sgi.com> Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 10:06:49 -0500 (CDT) From: Alan Mayer <ajm@....com> To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> Cc: Alan Mayer <ajm@....com>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: Change FIRST_SYSTEM_VECTOR to a variable. On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Alan Mayer <ajm@....com> wrote: > > > Subject: [PATCH] x86_64: Change FIRST_SYSTEM_VECTOR to a variable. > > > > From: Alan Mayer <ajm@....com> > > > > The SGI UV system needs several more system vectors than a vanilla > > x86_64 system. Rather than burden the other archs with extra system > > vectors that they don't use, change FIRST_SYSTEM_VECTOR to a variable, > > so that it can be dynamic. > > nice - but please split this up into two patches: first one that changes > the generic code to use a variable limit - this patch will (should) be a > functional NOP. > > then a second patch adds those two new UV vectors. > > Also, could you please also change the 32-bit side as well so that we at > least keep the two implementations roughly in sync? > > Ingo > Sure, I can do that. --ajm Now he lives in the islands And fishes the pylons And drinks his Green Label each day. -- Alan J. Mayer SGI ajm@....com WORK: 651-683-3131 HOME: 651-407-0134 -- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists