[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86802c440804091328s4127422dk593384c32ba56e88@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 13:28:09 -0700
From: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
To: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: "Alan Mayer" <ajm@....com>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
"linux-kernel list" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: Change FIRST_SYSTEM_VECTOR to a variable.
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 7:59 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
> * Alan Mayer <ajm@....com> wrote:
>
> > Subject: [PATCH] x86_64: Change FIRST_SYSTEM_VECTOR to a variable.
> >
> > From: Alan Mayer <ajm@....com>
> >
> > The SGI UV system needs several more system vectors than a vanilla
> > x86_64 system. Rather than burden the other archs with extra system
> > vectors that they don't use, change FIRST_SYSTEM_VECTOR to a variable,
> > so that it can be dynamic.
>
> nice - but please split this up into two patches: first one that changes
> the generic code to use a variable limit - this patch will (should) be a
> functional NOP.
>
> then a second patch adds those two new UV vectors.
>
> Also, could you please also change the 32-bit side as well so that we at
> least keep the two implementations roughly in sync?
>
for x86_64, current from 0x20 to 0x2f, we only use one for irq migration.
wonder if you can use 2 from them for UV...
YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists