[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0804091217150.7000@alien.or.mcafeemobile.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 12:19:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
zach.brown@...cle.com, jroberson@...sapeake.net
Subject: Re: [patch] eventfd/kaio integration fix
On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Apr 2008 11:45:47 -0700 (PDT)
> Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org> wrote:
>
> > Jeff Roberson discovered a race when using kaio eventfd based
> > notifications. This patch fixes the race by moving the notification inside
> > the spinlocked section of kaio.
>
> Missing information.
>
> What are the consequences of this race, when it occurs?
This was described in the original email. I posted a patch back then
(waiting for Jeff test feedback - that never came), but then I forgot
about it till now:
http://groups.google.com/group/linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/e814b54c14198616
> > The operation is safe since eventfd
> > spinlock and kaio one are unrelated.
>
> Yes, it's safe from that perspective.
>
> However with this patch applied, we will no longer run eventfd_signal() if
> kiocbIsCancelled(iocb). Convincing is needed, please?
This was the intended behaviour. No event was actually *ready*, so no need
to signal completion of an event.
- Davide
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists