[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080409120812.cad8f173.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 12:08:12 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, zach.brown@...cle.com,
jroberson@...sapeake.net
Subject: Re: [patch] eventfd/kaio integration fix
On Wed, 9 Apr 2008 11:45:47 -0700 (PDT)
Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org> wrote:
> Jeff Roberson discovered a race when using kaio eventfd based
> notifications. This patch fixes the race by moving the notification inside
> the spinlocked section of kaio.
Missing information.
What are the consequences of this race, when it occurs?
> The operation is safe since eventfd
> spinlock and kaio one are unrelated.
Yes, it's safe from that perspective.
However with this patch applied, we will no longer run eventfd_signal() if
kiocbIsCancelled(iocb). Convincing is needed, please?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists