[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080409084200.GA32466@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 10:42:00 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Amnon Shiloh <u3557@...o.sublimeip.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86 vdso 32-bit vdso-disabling fixes
* Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com> wrote:
> These two patches together address two potential bugs when trying to
> disable the 32-bit vDSO via sysctl or boot parameters (vdso32=0).
>
> Currently, every 32-bit exec gets the vDSO mapped even if it's
> disabled (the process just doesn't get told about it). Because it's
> in fact always there, the bug that patch 1/2 fixes cannot happen now.
> With patch 2/2, it won't be mapped at all when it's disabled, which is
> one of the things that people might really want when they disable it
> (so nothing they didn't ask for goes into their address space).
>
> The 32-bit signal handler setup when SA_RESTORER is not used refers to
> current->mm->context.vdso without regard to whether the vDSO has been
> disabled when the process was exec'd. Patch 1/2 fixes this not to use
> it when it's null, which becomes possible after patch 2/2. (This
> never happens in normal use, because glibc's sigaction call uses
> SA_RESTORER unless glibc detected the vDSO.)
thanks Roland, applied.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists