[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.00.0804110747370.3143@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 07:58:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Kyle McMartin <kyle@...artin.ca>
cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] reorganize <linux/linkage.h>
On Fri, 11 Apr 2008, Kyle McMartin wrote:
>
> Commit 54a015104136974262afa4b8ddd943ea70dec8a2 adds some new magic
> asmlinkage_protect gizmo, but that can only be used from C code, not
> assembly. Protect relevant bits of <linux/linkage.h> with !__ASSEMBLY__
> so this can't leak into assembly source.
Ok, so s390 had a similar issue, and I assumed that they were just usign a
broken C pre-processor for asm, but now I'm starting to wonder about it.
Why cannot your pre-processor handle that thing?
It doesn't matter if it is C or assembly, the pre-processor should be the
same. That #define isn't used for asm, so it shouldn't _matter_ for asm.
What's going on?
I'm starting to suspect that it's the fact that some architectures still
have
EXTRA_AFLAGS := -traditional
or equivalent and I'm wondering whether that is really necessary. IIRC x86
got rid of the use of --traditional a long time ago, exactly because it
caused problems with any fancier C preprocessor things.
It would probably be much better to try to lose that -traditional from
affected architectures, because otherwise issues like this will keep
popping up just because the most common architecture doesn't use the
limited preprocessor..
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists