[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080411.112631.218741504.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 11:26:31 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: kyle@...artin.ca, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, roland@...hat.com,
heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, schwidefsky@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] reorganize <linux/linkage.h>
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 07:58:56 -0700 (PDT)
> I'm starting to suspect that it's the fact that some architectures still
> have
>
> EXTRA_AFLAGS := -traditional
>
> or equivalent and I'm wondering whether that is really necessary. IIRC x86
> got rid of the use of --traditional a long time ago, exactly because it
> caused problems with any fancier C preprocessor things.
A lot of it is probably simply copy and paste from other ports.
When I removed it from Sparc long ago, the only issue I had was that
there were some things using "/**/" concatenation in some sparc
assembler CPP macros, and those were easily fixed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists