[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080411081901.f56f5180.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 08:19:01 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, mingo <mingo@...hat.com>,
tglx <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for April 10 (arch/x86)
On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 09:46:31 +0200 Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> > Fix printk formats in x86/mm/ioremap.c:
> >
> > next-20080410/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c:137: warning: format '%llx' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 2 has type 'resource_size_t'
> > next-20080410/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c:188: warning: format '%llx' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 2 has type 'resource_size_t'
> > next-20080410/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c:188: warning: format '%llx' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'long unsigned int'
>
> thanks, applied.
>
> > if (!phys_addr_valid(phys_addr)) {
> > printk(KERN_WARNING "ioremap: invalid physical address %llx\n",
> > - phys_addr);
> > + (unsigned long long)phys_addr);
>
> is there really no way to solve this more cleanly than a forced cast?
I haven't seen any other decent solutions. This is what we do
all over the kernel.
> It
> is a totally uninteresting warning that we pass in a narrower type to
> printk(). It cannot ever cause any bugs or problems. Why does gcc warn
> about it?
No idea about that part.
---
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists