linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for April 10 (arch/x86)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 11 Apr 2008 09:46:31 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, mingo <mingo@...hat.com>,
	tglx <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for April 10 (arch/x86)


* Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> wrote:

> Fix printk formats in x86/mm/ioremap.c:
> 
> next-20080410/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c:137: warning: format '%llx' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 2 has type 'resource_size_t'
> next-20080410/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c:188: warning: format '%llx' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 2 has type 'resource_size_t'
> next-20080410/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c:188: warning: format '%llx' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'long unsigned int'

thanks, applied.

>  	if (!phys_addr_valid(phys_addr)) {
>  		printk(KERN_WARNING "ioremap: invalid physical address %llx\n",
> -		       phys_addr);
> +		       (unsigned long long)phys_addr);

is there really no way to solve this more cleanly than a forced cast? It 
is a totally uninteresting warning that we pass in a narrower type to 
printk(). It cannot ever cause any bugs or problems. Why does gcc warn 
about it?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/