[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200804140027.12161.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 00:27:11 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: benh@...nel.crashing.org
Cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@...e.de>,
David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>,
Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@...a.org.au>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] PM: Introduce new top level suspend and hibernation callbacks (rev. 8)
On Monday, 14 of April 2008, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> > > I don't see the point... On the contrary, prepare() is the pefect place
> > > to implement handshaking with userspace for drivers that need to do so,
> > > such as the DRM.
> >
> > This _comment_ reflects the current situation, which is that we freeze tasks
> > before a suspend. When it's no longer necessary to do that, I'll be happy to
> > change this comment. For now, however, that's not the case.
>
> Can't we run the freezer after prepare() instead ?
Well, I'm not sure and I'm not going to introduce the change right now, after
the paches have been included in -mm.
That would require quite some changes in the core code that I'd prefer to
avoid for now. We can do something like this in a separate patch series after
the present one settles down a bit.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists