[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1208126822.6958.63.camel@pasglop>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 08:47:02 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@...e.de>,
David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>,
Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@...a.org.au>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] PM: Introduce new top level suspend and
hibernation callbacks (rev. 8)
> Well, I'm not sure and I'm not going to introduce the change right now, after
> the paches have been included in -mm.
>
> That would require quite some changes in the core code that I'd prefer to
> avoid for now. We can do something like this in a separate patch series after
> the present one settles down a bit.
I disagree.
Doing it later would introduce yet another major semantic change.
I think we should get it right now. There's no hurry in pushing things
especially if they aren't quite right.
The ability for prepare() callbacks to sync with userland,
request_firmware, etc... is an important feature that's been needed for
some time imho.
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists