[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080414201639.799770f4@core>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 20:16:39 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
Ingo Oeser <ioe-lkml@...eria.de>,
Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Replace completions with semaphores
> Because we can then eventually get rid of semaphores, so those people
> cannot mistakenly use them. Its just too easy to create prio inversion
> with them around.
And it'll be far harder to even find the priority inversion problems in
the open coded alternatives.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists