[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e2e108260804142318m19cf55c7p9973d3500de18120@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 08:18:05 +0200
From: "Bart Van Assche" <bart.vanassche@...il.com>
To: "Andi Kleen" <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: "Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Roland Dreier" <rdreier@...co.com>, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Matthew Wilcox" <matthew@....cx>,
"Ingo Oeser" <ioe-lkml@...eria.de>,
"Daniel Walker" <dwalker@...sta.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Replace completions with semaphores
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 9:16 PM, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
> For me it sounds like you just want to rename semaphores to some other
> name that people don't use them for normal locking?
Would it really be a good idea to give a synchronization concept that
behaves exactly like a semaphore another name than "semaphore" ? The
semaphore concept is well known and is taught in every computer
science course.
Bart.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists