linux-kernel - Re: why 2 Kernel command line and module option parsers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <480517DC.3060303@redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:02:20 -0400
From:	Chris Snook <csnook@...hat.com>
To:	Shen Feng <shen@...fujitsu.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: why 2 Kernel command line and module option parsers

Shen Feng wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Now we get two Kernel command line and module option parsers, i.e.
> lib/cmdline.c
> lib/parser.c
> 
> I think we'd better merge them into one and make a kernel option standard since
> the kernel options become more and more.

Are you volunteering?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/