[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1208235803.11920.62.camel@brick>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 22:03:23 -0700
From: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
To: David Chinner <dgc@....com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-possible bugfix] xfs: ensure extents are read as be64
On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 14:58 +1000, David Chinner wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 08:28:51PM -0700, Harvey Harrison wrote:
> > The debug code reads the extents in cpu-order rather than BE. Make the
> > debug code match.
>
> xfs_validate_extents() is reading in-core extents which have already
> been byte-swapped when they were read into memory.
>
> FWIW, when changing anything to do with endian conversion, please
> ensure you run:
>
> $ make C=2 CHECKFLAGS="-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__"
>
> over the change. This change would introduce errors because:
>
> typedef struct xfs_bmbt_rec_host {
> __uint64_t l0, l1;
> } xfs_bmbt_rec_host_t;
>
> is not defined with __beXX types like the disk format version of this
> structure which is:
>
> typedef struct xfs_bmbt_rec_64 {
> __be64 l0, l1;
> } xfs_bmbt_rec_64_t;
>
Sorry for the noise, I didn't notice the (slightly) different struct
types. Just the very similar looking blocks in both functions.
My Bad,
Harvey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists