[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080415045541.GA611@1wt.eu>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 06:55:42 +0200
From: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, jmorris@...ei.org,
viro@...IV.linux.org.uk, david@...g.hm, sclark46@...thlink.net,
johnpol@....mipt.ru, rjw@...k.pl, tilman@...p.cc,
Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, lkml@....ca, jesper.juhl@...il.com,
yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, jeff@...zik.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, git@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Reporting bugs and bisection
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 04:05:13PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:01:05 -0700 (PDT)
> David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>
> > From: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
> > Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 01:54:00 +1000 (EST)
> >
> > > - Things like "who made the kernel" statistics and related articles ignore
> > > code review.
> >
> > Note the apparent irony in that the person who ends up often on the
> > top of those lists, Al Viro, is also someone who also does a
> > significant amount of code review.
> >
> > I think this is no accident.
>
> "who made the kernel" was an interesting and useful exercise, but if you
> like irony then...
>
> - The way to boost your commit count is to submit buggy patches and to
> then fix your own bugs.
>
> - The way to lower your commit count is to fix things in other people's
> patches, then fold your fix into the base patch. I've lost over 1000
> commits that way. Unless they are counting '^ [akpm' as a commit.
And if Dave speaks about these stats : http://lwn.net/Articles/237768/
then Al does not even appear in it, which proves your point.
Willy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists