[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080416.134127.128610481.xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:41:27 +0800 (CST)
From: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: jdike@...toit.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...l.org,
user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Patch] UML: Fix another build error
From: Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 11:43:42 -0400
> On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 11:39:14PM +0800, WANG Cong wrote:
> >
> > This patch fixes the following build error.
> >
> > CC arch/um/drivers/mconsole_kern.o
> > /home/wangcong/projects/linux-2.6/arch/um/drivers/mconsole_kern.c:337: error: redefinition of ‘mconsole_register_dev’
> > /home/wangcong/projects/linux-2.6/arch/um/include/mconsole_kern.h:47: error: previous definition of ‘mconsole_register_dev’ was here
> > make[2]: *** [arch/um/drivers/mconsole_kern.o] Error 1
> > make[1]: *** [arch/um/drivers/mconsole_kern.ko] Error 2
> > make: *** [sub-make] Error 2
>
> This one is fishy. For one thing, it looks like you reproduce this
> with !CONFIG_MCONSOLE, but I just successfully built a
> !CONFIG_MCONSOLE UML.
>
> Second, the arch/um/drivers/Makefile looks to me (and the build log
> confirms) that mconsole_kern.c isn't compiled with !CONFIG_MCONSOLE.
>
> Third, you should ask yourself if there might be a deeper problem that
> needs fixing if you find yourself putting #ifdef CONFIG_FOO in files
> which implement FOO.
Thanks for teaching this!
I will try if it's possible to reproduce this.
Cong
Powered by blists - more mailing lists