[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080417002552.5742ad65.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 00:25:52 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [v2.6.26] what's brewing in x86.git for v2.6.26
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 22:23:38 +0200 Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
> what's brewing in x86.git for v2.6.26?
How much of this has not been in -mm?
How much of this has not been in linux-next?
> too many topics to list them all - there are 884 patches from 74 authors
> at the moment.
>
> a few highlights:
>
> - 4096 CPUs support. (Yes, such big boxes exist, and they run Linux.)
>
> - mmiotrace feature: trace accesses to hw components to help figure out
> how they are programmed.
>
> - kmemcheck feature: Valgrind for the native Linux kernel in essence -
> detects access to uninitialized memory.
>
> - ftrace plugin for sysprof
sysprof is crap.
> - fixed StackProtector security feature (these fixes were too intrusive
> for v2.6.25)
>
> - lazy FPU allocation/speedup - offloaded/large FPU/SSE state support
>
> - SMP-boot, mpparse, DMA ops unification
>
> - PAT support - first step towards phasing out MTRR's for cache
> attribute control
>
> - enable GBPAGES - faster TLB misses on CPUs that support it
>
> - debug helper: view kernel pagetable layout via debugfs
Needs documentation.
> x86: introduce /dev/mem restrictions with a config option
This should be runtime-settable, not build-time settable.
> ...
>
> Randy Dunlap (2):
> ...
> linux-next: Tree for April 10 (arch/x86)
borked patch title.
> Soren Sandmann (1):
> x86: add the debugfs interface for the sysprof tool
There were serious objections that this is weaker than and duplicative of
oprofile which were not adequately addressed.
Also, I (and apparently only I) actually reviewed the implementation and
found it to be riddled with bugs and shortcomings. afacit this was
completely ignored and you propose to merge it anwyay?
I obviously don't have time to go through it all, but I'm afraid I cannot
be very confident in it. All I can say is "the parts which have been in
-mm seem to compile and run". A quick grep indicates that only 644 of
these 884 patches are in -mm. And a lot of them only turned up a week or
two ago.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists