linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH-mm 1/3] mac80211: tkip.c use get/put

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1208450454.4066.20.camel@johannes.berg>
Date:	Thu, 17 Apr 2008 18:40:54 +0200
From:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Cc:	Jiri Benc <jbenc@...e.cz>,
	Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH-mm 1/3] mac80211: tkip.c use get/put_unaligned helpers


> > I guess you are going to push this stuff through -mm altogether, right? 
> > I can hardly take this into my tree right now, as the helpers are not in 
> > Linus' tree yet.
> 
> yeah, sorry, that's been confusing a few people.
> 
> Strictly I'd merge the core infrastructure and then send the dependent 
> patches into the relevant maintainers.  But that can mean than we 
> needlessly miss the merge window, so it's most parctical to send along an 
> acked-by and I'll merge the dependent patch directly with the appropriate 
> ordering.

I guess what Jiri (Benc) is saying that *I* should ack them, not him.
Jiri (Benc), maybe you care to move yourself down in the maintainers
file?

johannes

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (829 bytes)