linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.25 section mismatches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e2e108260804170949p6cceb4em78455d8dc5ff7261@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 17 Apr 2008 18:49:36 +0200
From:	"Bart Van Assche" <bart.vanassche@...il.com>
To:	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <greg@...ah.com>,
	"Chris Wright" <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
Cc:	rufus-azrael@...ericable.fr
Subject: Re: 2.6.25 section mismatches

On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Bart Van Assche
<bart.vanassche@...il.com> wrote:
> Apparently there is a significant number of section mismatches in the
>  2.6.25 kernel. These were already reported against 2.6.25-rc1 and are
>  still present in the final 2.6.25 release. These section mismatches
>  show up at least on the i386 and x86_64 architectures. Maybe it's a
>  good idea before a patch is merged not only to check whether the patch
>  applies cleanly but also to check whether it doesn't create any new
>  section mismatches ?
>
>  See also http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9974.

Who should look into this ?

Bart.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/