linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.25 section mismatches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:01:49 -0700
From:	Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
To:	Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...il.com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@...ah.com>,
	Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
	rufus-azrael@...ericable.fr, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.25 section mismatches

* Bart Van Assche (bart.vanassche@...il.com) wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Bart Van Assche
> <bart.vanassche@...il.com> wrote:
> > Apparently there is a significant number of section mismatches in the
> >  2.6.25 kernel. These were already reported against 2.6.25-rc1 and are
> >  still present in the final 2.6.25 release. These section mismatches
> >  show up at least on the i386 and x86_64 architectures. Maybe it's a
> >  good idea before a patch is merged not only to check whether the patch
> >  applies cleanly but also to check whether it doesn't create any new
> >  section mismatches ?
> >
> >  See also http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9974.
> 
> Who should look into this ?

Sam, any of these look familiar (or put another way...are there still
outstanding section mismatch fixes in -mm)?

thanks,
-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/