| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20080417170149.GC17220@sequoia.sous-sol.org> Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:01:49 -0700 From: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org> To: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...il.com> Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@...ah.com>, Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>, rufus-azrael@...ericable.fr, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> Subject: Re: 2.6.25 section mismatches * Bart Van Assche (bart.vanassche@...il.com) wrote: > On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Bart Van Assche > <bart.vanassche@...il.com> wrote: > > Apparently there is a significant number of section mismatches in the > > 2.6.25 kernel. These were already reported against 2.6.25-rc1 and are > > still present in the final 2.6.25 release. These section mismatches > > show up at least on the i386 and x86_64 architectures. Maybe it's a > > good idea before a patch is merged not only to check whether the patch > > applies cleanly but also to check whether it doesn't create any new > > section mismatches ? > > > > See also http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9974. > > Who should look into this ? Sam, any of these look familiar (or put another way...are there still outstanding section mismatch fixes in -mm)? thanks, -chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists