[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080417174440.GA14864@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:44:40 +0200
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@...ah.com>,
rufus-azrael@...ericable.fr
Subject: Re: 2.6.25 section mismatches
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:01:49AM -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Bart Van Assche (bart.vanassche@...il.com) wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Bart Van Assche
> > <bart.vanassche@...il.com> wrote:
> > > Apparently there is a significant number of section mismatches in the
> > > 2.6.25 kernel. These were already reported against 2.6.25-rc1 and are
> > > still present in the final 2.6.25 release. These section mismatches
> > > show up at least on the i386 and x86_64 architectures. Maybe it's a
> > > good idea before a patch is merged not only to check whether the patch
> > > applies cleanly but also to check whether it doesn't create any new
> > > section mismatches ?
> > >
> > > See also http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9974.
> >
> > Who should look into this ?
>
> Sam, any of these look familiar (or put another way...are there still
> outstanding section mismatch fixes in -mm)?
>From a quick scan I will say that at least half of these have pending fixes in -mm.
I'm looking forward to see where we are after Andrew's first merge.
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists