[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <480B9856.3040902@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 23:24:06 +0400
From: Dmitri Vorobiev <dmitri.vorobiev@...il.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, mingo@...e.hu,
tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86: remove unused code and data in nexgen.c
Andi Kleen пишет:
> "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> writes:
>
>> Dmitri Vorobiev wrote:
>>> Nobody calls the function nexgen_init_cpu(), therefore it
>>> can be removed. The variable nexgen_cpu_dev is used only by
>>> this function, so this patch removes useless data as well.
>>> This patch was build-tested using defconfigs for i386 and x86_64.
>>> It also survived a few randconfig instances for i386. Runtime
>>> tests were performed by booting 32-bit and 64-bit x86 boxen up to
>>> the shell prompt.
>> NAK. This is broken.
>>
>> The reason nexgen_cpu_dev is unreferenced is because the file is
>> missing a cpu_vendor_dev_register(), which should be added.
>
> If we did that long without it wouldn't it be better to just remove it?
>
> Also NexGen was never shipped anyways, but bought by AMD and became
> the K6. So I assume whatever this file is supposed to do is done
> by amd.c anyways.
>
IOW, you claim that now it's safe enough to throw away the NexGen
altogether?
Dmitri
> -Andi
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists