[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <480AF43D.1090405@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 13:13:57 +0530
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
CC: Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamamoto@...inux.co.jp>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
containers@...ts.osdl.org,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][-mm] Memory controller hierarchy support (v1)
Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
>
> Are you going to split this patch? As is it looks rather huge :)
>
Sure
>> TODO's/Open Questions
>>
>> 1. We need to hold cgroup_mutex while walking through the children
>> in reclaim. We need to figure out the best way to do so. Should
>> cgroups provide a helper function/macro for it?
>> 2. Do not allow children to have a limit greater than their parents.
>> 3. Allow the user to select if hierarchial support is required
>> 4. Fine tune reclaim from children logic
>>
>
> I though about it recently. Can we have a cgroup file, which will
> control whether to attach a res_counter to the parent? This will
> address the YEMEMOTO's question about the performance.
>
It's one of the TODOS
--
Warm Regards,
Balbir Singh
Linux Technology Center
IBM, ISTL
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists